Despite decades of effort, people from low-income and Black, Latine, and Indigenous communities remain vastly underrepresented in science- and math-related fields.

BEAM aims to change the dramatic underrepresentation of these students at the highest levels of achievement, to instill a genuine love for mathematics, and to open up opportunities for fulfilling, well-paid STEM careers. 

The Gap Begins Early

While students from more affluent communities often have access to school and enrichment programs that help them explore deeper topics in math and problem solving, kids from lower-income communities (especially Black, Latinx/Hispanic, and Indigenous kids) often have no such access. As a result, we begin to see a disparity in students' mathematical achievement from a young age, especially when we look at who is achieving at a high level. On the National Assessment of Educational Progress, only 3% of low-income eighth graders (those eligible for federally-subsidized lunches) score at the Advanced level, while 14% of 8th graders overall score at this level.  By 12th grade, the percentage of low-income students scoring at the Advanced level is not even given—it “rounds to zero.”

Percent Scoring at Advanced Level, by Income

Percent scoring at the advanced level on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 8th and 12th grade.

Percent Scoring at Advanced Level, by Race/EThnicity

Percent scoring at the advanced level on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in 8th and 12th grade.

Under-prepared students aren't ready for college courses

"Math, Science Popular Until Students Realize They're Hard," reads the almost satirical headline of a recent Wall Street Journal article.  A working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research found that students who had initially declared majors in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields still dropped out when they faced classes that were harder than they expected, despite their interest in the field.  On the other hand, students who had taken advanced courses in high school were better prepared for the true demands of their STEM classes. 

BEAM collaboration

STUDENTS DON'T STAY ON STEM PATHWAY

Compared to their affluent peers, students from high-poverty schools who enroll in college:

  • Are 24% less likely to attend college than more affluent peers

  • Are 40% less likely to choose an engineering major

  • Have a GPA that is 0.7 (out of 4) points lower

  • Among those who choose engineering, have only an 18% chance of graduating with a degree (compared to 52%)

At every level, low-income students fall out of the pathway in greater numbers than their peers.

BEAM mentoring